The MA of Sustainability for the
Interior Environment was launched at FIT during summer 2011, with a small group
of 10 Design professionals. But it
really began months before when we were contemplating the idea of starting a
Master in sustainability and each of us asked ourselves: why do we care? And
what can we do about it? While for most of us it was a career move, it was mainly
a strong conviction that there must be a more responsible way to design and
build. The urge to seek this out is what brought us together here.
The program began with a good dose of
healthy debates over the societal impact of design. These discussions exposed both
our common and conflicting ideals of sustainable design. Throughout the course
of the first semesters, the program challenged our sustainable design
assumptions by showing that simply taking a stand for the environment and the
people who live on the planet is not enough. Design lives within a context that includes more than just
materials and aesthetics. The program pushes us past the limits of conventional
design practices by exploring literature related to such areas of study as behavioral
research and policy studies revealing the incredible connectedness that takes
place between design, people and the natural environment.
Being an FIT Graduate student certainly
keeps us on our toes. The classes give
us the broad and big picture strategies about how we can make a difference. But
it is the back and forth between expansive personal research and the collaborative
approach in class that encourages discussions and fast forward thinking.
Collectively we constantly ask ourselves: what resonates with us? What
information do we select? What do we report on?
As working professionals that dedicate
our time outside of our work-week toward this MA we are constantly navigating
the inevitable hurdles of time-consuming research. This same struggle is reflected in the real
world. Behavioral Research and Policy analysis is lacking in the business of interior
design…. And the reason, it’s time consuming. Interior design is a service-based
industry that depends as much on market economics as any other service. But it
has failed to recognize the value of these research initiatives. The business
of interior design largely centers primarily on aesthetics. While it may be
difficult to find conversations about Behavioral Research within most interior
design firms we must take into account that these tools exist in other
industries solely to increase profits. It works! So if these multi-national
corporations successes can be attributed to the extensive social research then
we can take this same model to impact the growth of sustainability and build a
healthier environment.
While we are here to explore what
“endures”, we have to break the current modus
operandi to better illuminate both the themes and pillars of sustainable
design: Environment, Economy, Equity and expose how these three E’s are not
enough. Research is what sheds light on
how we have to look at the pillars of cultures, what Jane Jacobs identified as
education, community, sciences, family and governments.
I feel that the MA program at FIT gives
us the tools and resources to bring behavioral research and policy analysis to
this field of study. As a result sustainable design is no longer a sysphean
mission. And while we can’t predict the future, we hope we can set the pace for
research to take place in the interior design field.
No comments:
Post a Comment